Left Unity supporter Salman Shaheen argues the case for a new party on the Red Pepper blog.
When Ken Loach launched an appeal to discuss founding a new party to the left of Labour in March, it sparked a wave of enthusiasm. Within a few weeks, more than 8,000 people signed up and around 100 local groups were established across the country.
It isn’t hard to see why. Austerity is devastating Britain. While the Conservative-led government is giving tax breaks to the richest individuals and biggest corporations, it is driving the most vulnerable people in the country deeper into poverty with public service cuts and the bedroom tax, which tragically claimed its first victim when Stephanie Bottrill committed suicide because she could not afford the £80 a month charge. Labour’s response to the Tories’ ideological assault on the poor has been weak, and its abstention on workfare a betrayal. The need for a new party to represent the interests of the working class, which have been ignored far too long by the three main parties, has never been greater.
On Saturday, Left Unity held its first national meeting, bringing together around 100 elected delegates from many of the local groups that have sprung up over the last few weeks in answer to Loach’s call. Some came from small towns where groups had only a handful of members. Others, such as the delegates from Brighton, spoke of vibrant and big meetings – Brighton already has a signed-up membership of more than 200 people.
Sitting in the same room together, these were no longer names on a signature sheet, but passionate activists from a vast range of left-wing traditions. Many of the familiar old alphabet soup far-left groups were represented. But there were also young campaigners from Occupy and UK Uncut, anarchists, Greens, trade unionists, disaffected Labour supporters and dozens who had never been involved in any party before, but wanted to change the world all the same.
With such a diverse group coming together for the first time, there were inevitably going to be disagreements. It proved too difficult to agree a statement of principles in such a short space of time, for example. But the meeting voted to move towards a founding conference in November and overwhelmingly supported the idea that a new party of the left should not be a patchwork coalition of far-left groups hastily thrown up as a temporary electoral front, but should be an active campaigning organisation built around the basic democratic principle of one member one vote.
‘We have been through some bitter experiences and we need to learn from the past,’ Loach said to the meeting. ‘We absolutely need to be a democratic party and I support the principle of one member, one vote. We’ve had groups trying to take projects over, we’ve had manipulations behind closed doors and we don’t want that again.’
‘Just like we don’t want one dominating group, we don’t want any charismatic leaders,’ he added, clearly expressing his desire not to be an unaccountable figurehead for the new party. Indeed, despite Loach’s appeal, much of the hard work has been done by the local groups, which have grown organically with their own ideas and ways of working, and Left Unity has been built from the bottom up. This must continue over the coming months as Left Unity moves towards its founding conference and the beginning of a vital new party of the left.
For too long the left has been divided and weak, its energies exhausted on sectarian splits. And absolutely no one in the real world cared. If, as Loach said, Left Unity is to learn from the mistakes of the past, it must be transparent, open, inclusive and democratic. If, as so many people at Saturday’s meeting said, we want to make a difference, we must first put aside our own differences.
The time for Left Unity is now.
[This article originally appeared on the Red Pepper blog at http://www.redpepper.org.uk/a-new-party-of-the-left-comes-one-step-closer/]
Left Unity is active in movements and campaigns across the left, working to create an alternative to the main political parties.
About Left Unity
Read our manifesto
Left Unity is a member of the European Left Party.
Read the European Left Manifesto
Events and protests from around the movement, and local Left Unity meetings.
Wednesday 17th September: Trump not Welcome
National Demonstration against Trump’s state visit
Sign up to the Left Unity email newsletter.
Get the latest Left Unity resources.
‘People can disagree and still have harmony, petty people can agree and not have harmony.’ – Confucius
Putting ‘aside our differences’ will only lead to resentment and pettiness. Anyway, ‘putting aside our differences’ contradicts being ‘open, inclusive and democratic.’
Darren Cahil
Discussing our differences is fine. Democratic debate is great. Insisting on your own way on every vote, and using every programatic difference as an excuse for an organisational split is not fine.
We have to put unity around the majority of things we agree on before splitting because of the minority of things we disagree on – especially if we are on the losing side in a vote. You can always try to persuade members and win the vote the next time – that’s what happens in a democratic party; sometimes you lose – sometimes you win.
I will stick with Left Unity as long as it agrees with more of my opinions than it opposes and is closer to my politics than any other party. The issue would have to be absolutely enormous and fundamental for me to split over it.
I wasn’t suggesting we should not discuss our differences, but that we should not let our disagreements get in the way of working together.
I agree, in principle, Salman.
But is Left Unity trying to build a new party “Of” the left, or “For” the left? Under FPTP (like it or not – and I don’t – that’s the current system), the reality is you need a coalition of views to pull together to gain votes.
I, personally, am a mutualist. I’m completely willing to accept that my views will be a minority within any part of the left, and accept that the party views might not agree with mine on some issues. But there’s already for example some people who want to define LU as “Socialist”, which immediately places pre-restraints…
I agree we don’t need organized membership by the existing parties of the left, but unless LU is willing to let all the left, as individuals, come and hear, and debate…