First meeting between Left Unity and TUSC

tuscSharon McCourt from Left Unity’s National Co-ordinating Group reports on the recent meeting between Left Unity and the Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition, with additional thoughts from Bianca Todd.

As agreed by Left Unity’s National Coordinating Group (NCG) in June, four of us went along from Left Unity to meet with delegates from TUSC. Left unity delegates were myself (Sharon McCourt), Andrew Burgin, Bianca Todd and Kate Hudson.

TUSC delegates were Dave Nellist and Clive Heemskirk for the Socialist Party and for RMT Sean McGowan, Darren Ireland and Sean Hoyle. A little late Peter Pinkney, the RMT president also joined us. Will McMahon who is both a member of TUSC via the Independent Socialist Network (ISN) and a supporter of Left Unity, was also present. As the Left Unity delegation was not aware that Will would be present there was a short discussion to clarify that he was there representing the ISN, not in a Left Unity capacity.

We began by introducing ourselves with a brief description of our involvement in the movement and what had led us to be there.

Kate began for us, giving a good explanation as to where we are at this point with Left Unity: everything is under discussion and nothing is set in stone although at the first meeting the overwhelming feeling was that we are and shall remain a one member one vote organisation. She pointed out from the outset that we had no authority to agree or decide on anything and that this was strictly a discussion for us to report back to the members of Left Unity. She gave the background about Ken Loach’s appeal and the 9000 people who had signed it and the fact that 90 groups had sprung up around the country. She explained that we were a work in progress, working towards a founding conference in November where we plan to form ourselves as a party.

Dave Nellist began for the TUSC delegation talking about the Socialist Party and the coalition that has been built, the organisations within it and where they are currently. TUSC members spoke of the coalition they had built between them and – because each organisation within it had the right of veto – that they worked by concentrating on the 80% they do agree on and moving forward on that basis. There were some observations about the extent to which people would always put their own party first, hindering the development of the coalition but the discussion was a constructive one.

I spoke next, about how I am new to this form of political work, but had come to be involved in Left Unity. I made my point that I strongly believe we need a new party, not a federation, not a coalition. How I live on a council estate in inner city Birmingham living with unemployment and that we need to give hope back to the people. That people need an alternative – something to get behind to give people a reason to vote at all – to build a real alternative. I have been a mother for years and so trade union representation has not been an issue for me and for a lot of the low paid poor it isn’t either, sadly. I saw the appeal from Ken Loach and signed up because we need a new party of the left. Labour sadly left that behind a long time ago.

Bianca spoke about her involvement with Unite and how she is involved with the trade unions within Left Unity, how she had avoided getting involved with politics for many years, but she truly believes in the Left Unity project. And how she believes we can build a new party and that trade union members can be a vital part of that.

Andrew spoke last from our delegation reinforcing the fact that this discussion was a positive step even though it could not reach any conclusions. He said that he believes that a new party can be formed and that we are moving forward towards our founding conference in November.

We finished with a general discussion where I believe that everyone in the room agreed we are on a common path and that we have no wish to be fighting each other. There were suggestions from the TUSC side of possible electoral agreements, or even that Left Unity could become part of the TUSC coalition. The Left Unity delegation noted these proposals to report back to the NCG and supporters but we were clear that any decisions on these or any such proposal from any party or organisation would have to take place after the founding of the new party when the membership would decide. TUSC proposed that we had further meetings in future and our delegation agreed to put that suggestion to the NCG for consideration. So everything is now back to Left Unity for discussion. I found it a positive meeting and a good first step towards possible further meetings.

Sharon McCourt

 

solidarity5The discussion at the first meeting between Left Unity and TUSC was done so on a platform of mutual respect and understanding that whilst both organisations seek to provide a voice for the void in the left, there exists differing approaches to achieving this goal.

 In particular Dave Nellist’s words around “let us concentrate on what unites us and not of that which divides us” was a refreshing start to the meeting, which ensured that both set of delegates were able to share open and honest reflections. Around the potential in terms of working alongside each other, working in partnership and of course, where differences may occur, for example Left Unity has made a firm commitment to being a one member one vote party and therefore whilst affiliating to TUSC may not be practical, a comradely commitment to ensuring that local communities are placed first to enable them to have a political voice.
With my Left Unity trade union working group cap on, I was encouraged to hear a shared desire from comrades to ensure that the trade unions themselves become engaged in a political process that provides working people with a voice. It is also clear that there is a shared understanding that the working relationship between both organisations will ultimately provide working people who have been disassociated with the trade union movement with a real, tangible link to the political process and the values which underpin the work of the trade union; which ultimately can only benefit both organisations in terms of long term membership.
As Left Unity moves steadily towards it’s founding conference, I look forward to building the relationship with TUSC and feel the confident that both are singing from the same song sheets to engage the beyond our trade union families to provide a real alternative to the three traditional political parties.

Bianca Todd

 

 


7 comments

7 responses to “First meeting between Left Unity and TUSC”

  1. Terry Burns says:

    As a Tusc supporter via ISN and a signed up Left Unity supporter I am delighted to see this meeting had been held and seems to be positive and hope it moves forward.

  2. Lloyd Edwards says:

    I’m not sure this will make sense if kept short, but I’ll try. The “Citizens United”, decision should be a warning to grassroots. “building the relationship with TUSC” is important, but TUSC members are MORE important. We know some Unions must, by their rules, have diferent aims than many LU members, and very often their own members. The same Union officials who support funding Labour only deserve one voice, not the voice of the Union, nor to be accepted as such by LU. Funding Labour while being integaral to LU only benefits Union officials (as I see it) not Union members or LU supporters.

  3. Lloyd – I agree with you that there is a clash between the values of LU and that of the Labour Party. TUSC is arguing that unions should stop supporting the Labour Party and put their resources and energies into building a new party for working-class people. The RMT union, which is helping to build TUSC, does not support Labour. I agree with Dave Nellist – let’s work together and concentrate on what unites us rather than divides us.

    On One Member One Vote – I don’t see a contradiction between being part of LU and LU affiliating to TUSC on that score. You can stand as LU and still be part of TUSC. LU remains free to be organised in whatever way it chooses. The component parts of TUSC, as long as they agree with TUSC’s core principles (which I believe LU does) are free to campaign under their own banners, in their own way.

    • John Penney says:

      But Why would we, Andrew ? Once Left Unity(under its still to be decided eventual party name) has built up a solid base of members and supporters in localities – through year round broad base campaigning work, why on earth would we want to then stand under the election-time only electoral “brand” of “TUSC” ?

      It’s not as if it’s been a successful umbrella grouping so far is it ? Come on , it’s vote has in most cases been in the “Monster Raving Loony Party” area of laughably small votes. TUSC is a failed SP (with half-hearted SWP involvement) “front” initiative of the old school of Trot initiatives . We need a serious radical Left political party to offer a believable alternative to Labour – not a cobbled together front aimed at funnelling a small number of the participants hoovered up by the front into the arms of one or more of the revolutionary Trot sects.

  4. pete b says:

    thanks for report. would be more interested to see how tusc trade unionists can work with left unity trade unionists than electoral agreements.
    i understand tusc refused socialist resistance a seat on tusc coalition. so its interesting that they offer a place to left unity.
    i think we are closer to the independant socialist network an affiliate to tusc. will is already in both isn and left unity. have others joined too?
    perhaps if we could win isn to left unity other parts of tusc would move closer to left unity.
    just a thought. can we ask to speak at isn meeting, indiscrete i know.
    pete b

  5. Hch says:

    A good start. It is vital that both Left Unity and TUSC do not stand in elections against each other or it will appear like a scene out of ‘The Life of Brian’. Similar can be said in relation to Galloway’s Respect. TUSC is in a difficult position with poor election results and now dropping the TUSC strap for the EU elections, instead standing on the nationalist-sounding ‘No2EU’ name. That is a mistake but with the TUSC name not well known and not having an individual membership, maybe a new umbrella formation/understanding will result, avoiding left clashes in elections and further afield. One fly in the ointment is that the SWP are part of TUSC. They have an appalling history in left formations, taking the ‘Rule or Ruin’ approach e.g. Respect, Socialist Alliance, UAF, unions etc. Added to that is their recent disgraceful behaviour over the Comrade Delta fiasco showing their undemocratic and misogynistic nature; this should act as a warning to all.

  6. Andrew Crystall says:

    Hch – Oh please. Most of the left will have little to do with Respect, and for good reason. Even ignoring those, parties which are cults of personality should certainly be vigorously competed with, regardless of their nominal electoral stance.


Left Unity is active in movements and campaigns across the left, working to create an alternative to the main political parties.

About Left Unity   Read our manifesto

Left Unity is a member of the European Left Party.

Read the European Left Manifesto  

ACTIVIST CALENDAR

Events and protests from around the movement, and local Left Unity meetings.

Saturday 21st June: End the Genocide – national march for Palestine

Join us to tell the government to end the genocide; stop arming Israel; and stop starving Gaza!

More details here

Summer University, 11-13 July, in Paris

Peace, planet, people: our common struggle

The EL’s annual summer university is taking place in Paris.

Full details here

More events »

GET UPDATES

Sign up to the Left Unity email newsletter.

CAMPAIGNING MATERIALS

Get the latest Left Unity resources.

Leaflet: Support the Strikes! Defy the anti-union laws!

Leaflet: Migration Truth Kit

Broadsheet: Make The Rich Pay

More resources »